Advanced Functional Automotive TPU | Multi-Constraint Custom Compounds & System-Level Selection
Advanced Functional Automotive TPU
For automotive projects where one standard grade is not enough.
Advanced functional compounds are designed for multi-constraint requirements such as
low temperature + grease/oil resistance + dynamic fatigue, abrasion + fluid exposure + heat aging,
or scratch resistance + low odor + dimensional stability.
not “missing one property”, but balancing multiple properties without breaking your molding or extrusion stability.
Failure-Mode Diagnosis
Trade-Off Management
Process Window Tuning
Custom Compounding
Verification Workflow
When to Choose Advanced Functional (Fast Check)
Choose advanced functional when
- Your part has 2+ dominant constraints (e.g., low-temp + grease + fatigue; or abrasion + fluids + heat aging).
- Trials pass one test but fail another (fatigue passes, then swelling happens; low odor passes, then scratch fails).
- Your production window is too narrow (surface defects, warpage, thickness variation, unstable output).
- Retesting cost is high and you need a shorter route to a stable shortlist.
Typical “multi-constraint” combinations
- Low temperature + Dynamic fatigue + Grease resistance (boots / bellows)
- Compression set control + Rebound tuning + NVH feel (bushings / dampers)
- Abrasion + Oil/Fuel/Coolant resistance + Heat aging (hose / harness covers, under-hood)
- Scratch resistance + Low odor/VOC + Heat aging stability (interior protection parts)
- Weathering + Handling wear + Dimensional stability (outdoor-exposed protection parts, project-dependent)
Common Failure Modes (Cause → Fix)
Advanced functional work typically starts from a failure diagnosis: the issue is usually an
imbalance between function, mechanics and processing.
| Symptom in Production / In Field | Most Common Cause | Typical Fix Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Cracking at folds after repeated bending (often worse in cold) | Fatigue margin reduced by low-temp stiffness rise; grease/aging further lowers toughness | Rebalance hardness + toughness; enhance cold-flex route; verify fatigue + cold + grease aging on molded parts |
| Softening / swelling after grease, oil, fuel or coolant exposure | Media incompatibility (project-dependent); property retention drops after long exposure | Upgrade media-resistance package; validate volume change and mechanical retention after fluid aging |
| NVH feel drifts over time (too bouncy, harshness increases) | Rebound/energy absorption balance not stable; compression set or modulus drift after aging | Tune rebound vs damping balance; improve compression set control; verify dynamic response after aging |
| Warpage / size drift after molding or aging | Internal stress and shrink not controlled; process window too sensitive; moisture impacts consistency | Drying discipline; pack/cool control; shrink tuning; validate dimensional stability after heat aging |
| Surface defects or unstable processing (flow marks, orange peel, thickness scatter) | Narrow process window; shear/heat imbalance; moisture or cooling instability | Stabilize processing window; adjust shear/temperature strategy; formulation tuning for repeatability |
stable part performance + repeatable processing at your real geometry, thickness, and service conditions.
Customization Options (Automotive-Relevant)
Below are typical directions we tune for automotive TPU parts. Final feasibility depends on part geometry, exposure media, process route, and verification plan.
Mechanics & Durability
- Fatigue resistance for repeated bending
- Tear / cut resistance for thin-wall or edge contact
- Compression set control for long-term load
Media & Aging Stability
- Grease, oil, fuel, coolant resistance (project-dependent)
- Heat aging stability and modulus drift control
- Weathering / ozone stability (project-dependent)
Surface & Interior Targets
- Scratch / mar resistance for visible interior parts
- Touch feel and appearance stability
- Low odor / low VOC positioning (project-dependent)
How We Run Projects (Shortlist → Stabilize → Verify)
1) Shortlist
We start from your part function, geometry, and dominant failure risk, then propose a small shortlist (usually 2–4 directions).
- Part type & geometry (thickness, corrugation, contact points)
- Service conditions (temperature window, media exposure, cycles)
- Dominant constraint(s) and acceptance criteria
2) Stabilize Processing
We align the compound and process window so production runs consistently across real cycle times and long runs.
- Drying discipline and material handling
- Heat/shear control (molding or extrusion)
- Cooling, shrink and surface stability control
3) Verify on Finished Parts
We recommend verification on finished parts at target thickness, not only resin-level tests.
- Function + mechanical durability (fatigue, tear, set)
- Combined aging (heat + media + cold, project-dependent)
- Fit, appearance, and process repeatability confirmation
Request Samples / TDS
To recommend an advanced functional shortlist quickly, please share:
- Part & geometry: application (CVJ boot / bellow / bushing / cover / interior protection), wall thickness range, and critical dimensions
- Dominant constraints: low temperature, fatigue, compression set, NVH feel, abrasion, scratch, low odor/VOC, heat aging, media resistance (grease/oil/fuel/coolant, project-dependent)
- Failure symptom (if any): cracking at folds, swelling/softening, set/creep, warpage, surface defects, squeak/rub noise (project-dependent)
- Process route: injection / blow molding / extrusion / sheet forming, plus any current processing notes and limits






