Interior Protection Parts TPU Compound | Scratch Resistance, Low Odor, Appearance Stability
Interior Protection Parts TPU Compound
TPU compounds designed for automotive interior protection parts such as guard plates, covers, and anti-scratch components.
These parts are judged by surface durability and appearance consistency in real daily use, while also requiring low odor,
low VOC positioning (project-dependent), and stable dimensions after heat aging. This page focuses on selection and processing guidance
for injection molding and sheet forming routes used in automotive interior protection components.
A successful TPU compound balances scratch/abrasion resistance with surface feel, low odor, and heat-aging dimensional stability—without introducing unnecessary surface coatings (project-dependent).
Stable Touch & Appearance
Low Odor / Low VOC
Heat Aging Stability
Dimensional Stability
Injection & Sheet Forming Fit
Typical Interior Protection Applications
- Guard plates / protective panels: high-contact areas requiring scuff and scratch resistance
- Covers and trim protection parts: surface durability plus appearance stability over time
- Anti-scratch components: parts exposed to repeated rubbing, footwear contact, or daily handling
- Sheet-formed protection elements: formed from TPU sheet where touch and surface uniformity matter (project-dependent)
Quick Grade Selection (Shortlist)
- Scratch and abrasion resistance is the primary target
- Scuff visibility and wear-through risk are key concerns
- You need a stable injection molding window for consistent surface
- Touch feel and appearance stability are primary evaluation points
- Low odor / low VOC positioning is important (project-dependent)
- Heat aging and dimensional stability are critical for fit and finish
Note: Final selection depends on surface texture target, hardness preference, scratch test method, odor/VOC requirement level (project-dependent), and processing route.
Key Performance Focus
Common Failure Modes (Cause → Fix)
Interior protection parts typically fail through surface defects, aging drift, or odor compliance issues. Use the diagnostic table below:
| Failure Mode | Most Common Cause | Recommended Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Scratches are too visible / scuff marks remain | Surface durability insufficient or texture/hardness balance not matched to contact conditions | Move to higher scratch/abrasion positioning; align hardness and texture replication to your test method |
| Appearance drift after heat aging (gloss/haze change) | Heat aging package not stable; surface changes amplify visual difference | Upgrade heat aging stabilization; validate appearance retention under your aging method (project-dependent) |
| Odor / VOC not acceptable | Formulation and processing not aligned to low-odor target; contamination risk in molding line | Use low odor / low VOC positioning; improve process cleanliness and drying control; confirm with your standard |
| Warpage or fit mismatch after molding | Shrink and cooling not stable; internal stress too high; uneven wall thickness | Dry thoroughly; stabilize packing and cooling; optimize gate and cooling for uniform shrink |
| Surface defects (flow marks, weld lines) | Moisture, unstable melt flow, or venting issues; texture replication not consistent | Improve drying; optimize temperature/shear; adjust venting and injection speed; validate on textured tools |
| Sheet forming defects (wrinkles, uneven thickness) | Forming temperature window not matched; sheet cooling history inconsistent (project-dependent) | Align forming window; tune sheet grade positioning for thermoforming stability (project-dependent) |
Use the Advanced Functional page to start a combined shortlist and validation plan.
Typical Grades & Positioning
| Grade Family | Hardness | Design Focus | Typical Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPU-AUTO INT Surface Durable | 85A–98A | Scratch / abrasion resistance with stable surface durability and repeatable injection molding | Guard plates and anti-scratch parts where scuff resistance is the primary KPI |
| TPU-AUTO INT Appearance & Low Odor | 80A–95A | Stable touch/appearance + low odor/low VOC positioning + heat aging dimensional stability (project-dependent) | Visible interior covers and protection parts where odor and appearance are strict |
Note: Exact positioning should be confirmed based on texture target, odor/VOC standard (project-dependent), and processing route (injection or sheet forming).
Processing Fit: Injection Molding & Sheet Forming
- Surface texture: Share your surface texture target and test method for scratch evaluation (project-dependent).
- Odor/VOC control: Confirm your standard and required test conditions; processing cleanliness and drying are important for consistent results.
- Dimensional targets: Provide critical dimensions and tolerance window to prioritize shrink and warpage control positioning.
Request Samples / TDS
Contact us to receive a recommended shortlist and technical data sheets for your interior protection parts. Providing your scratch test method and odor/VOC requirement will significantly improve first-trial success.
- Part type (guard plate / cover / anti-scratch part) and whether it is visible or hidden
- Surface target: texture/gloss expectation and scratch test method or acceptance criteria (project-dependent)
- Odor/VOC standard and test conditions (project-dependent)
- Heat aging conditions and service temperature window
- Critical dimensions and tolerance window
- Process route (injection molding or sheet forming) and constraints






